Cosme Rolland De Ravel vs Braden Shick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Aug at 04:19 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Rolland De Ravel vs B. Shick

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ravel 1 - 0 Shick
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cosme Rolland De Ravel winning 2 and Braden Shick winning 1. The last match between Cosme Rolland De Ravel and Braden Shick was at the M25 Southaven, 05-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 2-6 10-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ravel | 1 |
| Shick | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Southaven(08-05-25)
C. R. D. Ravel vs B. Shick H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.14% (8-6) | Career Total W/L | 57.89% (44-32) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. R. D. Ravel vs B. Shick Match Preview:
- How do the players compare on second serve performance? Shick has the advantage with 47.88% point wins compared to Ravel's 41.94%, a stat strongly linked to predicting match outcomes.
- When assessing return game effectiveness, Ravel outshines Shick on second serve returns with 47.15% points won versus Shick's 41.75%.
- In first serve return points, Ravel also leads with 26.79% compared to Shick's 23.48%, another key indicator in determining the likely match favorite.
- How do they perform under pressure? Shick narrowly edges out Ravel in breakpoint savings, with 56.47% compared to Ravel's 54.55%.
- Overall match performance over the last year shows Ravel winning 80% of their matches, notably higher than Shick's 52.94% win rate.
- On which surface do they thrive? Ravel is undefeated on Hard courts (100%), whereas Shick excels on I. Hard with a 64% win rate.
- Ravel has competed mostly at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level, winning 75%, while Shick has played more at the Futures/Satellites $10K level, winning 66.67%.
- Both players have faced differing quality opponents; Ravel has competed against higher-ranked players (average rank of 173.4) compared to Shick (average rank of 320.59).
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Ravel has historically been stronger, with a 100% success rate compared to Shick's 33% win rate.
- Current breakpoint conversion stats are close, with Ravel at 33.33% and Shick at 32.61%, important for live betting insights.
Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent statistics, Shick possesses an edge in second serve point achievements, putting them in a slightly favorable position when targeting this facet of the game. However, in return games, Ravel showcases comprehensive dominance, crucial in potentially capping Shick’s serve advantage.
Ravel’s superior performance in overall match play and against higher-caliber opponents suggests a more robust competitive edge, highlighting their adaptability and skill in diverse conditions. The psychological momentum from Ravel's unblemished record in decisive sets further amplifies their profile as a strong contender.
While Shick proves more adept on I. Hard surfaces, it is Ravel's exceptional past year win rate and breakpoint performance that consolidates their prospect as the likeliest victor in this contest.
With these factors considered, Ravel is predicted to emerge victorious in the forthcoming match based on a strategic evaluation of strengths and trends.
Cosme Rolland De Ravel vs Braden Shick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. R. D. Ravel vs B. Shick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 16 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:25:39 | Average Match Time | 2:25:39 |
| 49% (41/83) | 1st Serve % | 48% (32/67) |
| 59% (24/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (24/32) |
| 45% (19/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (13/35) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (6/16) |
| 45% (30/67) | Return Points Win % | 48% (40/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. R. D. Ravel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(4) 2-6 10-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(6) 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
B. Shick Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
F | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

C. R. D. Ravel vs B. Shick Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.14% (8/6) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.89% (44/32) |
| 51.61% (16/15) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.02% (94/68) |
| 51.05% (146/140) | Games Win/Loss | 53.96% (811/692) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.93% (33/26) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 28 | Aces Total | 226 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 46 | Total Double Faults | 120 |
| 1:31:46 | Average Match Time | 1:4:59 |
| 307.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 296.53 |
| 56% (464/834) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1802/3125) |
| 67% (309/464) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1260/1802) |
| 47% (174/370) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (669/1323) |
| 43% (36/83) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (126/286) |
| 41% (331/805) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1175/3052) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Challenger W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (43/25) |
| 57% (8/14) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (43/74) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
| 100% (3/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 100% (7/7) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (44/41) |
| 0% (7/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (44/3) |
| 14% (7/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (32/3) |